Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
V2.x Message Specification (V2)
-
V2.9
-
Patient Administration
-
Next of Kin / Associated Parties (NK1)
-
Patient Administration (Chapter 3)
-
3.4.5.34
-
-
Brian Postlethwaite / Sonja Ziegler : 14-0-1
-
Correction
-
Non-substantive
Description
IHL70311mismatchTableType.docxn THO it is labeled as HL7-defined, but in the chapter it says User-defined, which makes more sense, since it is NOT affecting HL7 operations.
Do I need a UTG proposal for this?
If yes, I would also like to add R = Retired and N = Not employed - since none of the current statuses cover that; IF that is not the right use of this field, then maybe we should have a code for Not Applicable and provide guidane that that is the code to use, when the person is either unemployed or retired