IHL70311mismatchTableType.docxn THO it is labeled as HL7-defined, but in the chapter it says User-defined, which makes more sense, since it is NOT affecting HL7 operations.

Do I need a UTG proposal for this?

If yes, I would also like to add R = Retired and N = Not employed - since none of the current statuses cover that; IF that is not the right use of this field, then maybe we should have a code for Not Applicable and provide guidane that that is the code to use, when the person is either unemployed or retired