Uploaded image for project: 'Other Specification Feedback'
  1. Other Specification Feedback
  2. OTHER-2780

Impossible to meaniningfully review in alloted time

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • HL7/IHE Specification: Service-oriented Device Point-of-care Interoperability Technical Framework (OTHER)
    • 2024JAN
    • Devices
    • (N/A)
    • Hide

      See discussion comment posted 2024.02.22.   

      Resolution:

      1. Provide short (10 minute) recordings to help reviewers understand what they are looking at
      2. Provide ballot reviewer instructions that help clarify (1) what to expect and (2) what to focus on or how to approach review of the specification 
        • In IHE supplement development, there are incremental reviews starting with business cases, then Vol 1, 2, 3. etc.
        • FOR HL7 Balloters ... who have not been part of that multi-year SDPi journey, consider focusing a ballot on specific areas that would follow a similar journey - e.g., starting with general scope and use cases
      3. Provide clarity regarding use case descriptions (namely, TF-1C ... mapped to profiles as appropriate) 
      4. Perform a "readability" editorial review of the current specification to identify means for facilitating review, commenting and implementation

       

      Show
      See discussion comment posted 2024.02.22.    Resolution: Provide short (10 minute) recordings to help reviewers understand what they are looking at Provide ballot reviewer instructions that help clarify (1) what to expect and (2) what to focus on or how to approach review of the specification  In IHE supplement development, there are incremental reviews starting with business cases, then Vol 1, 2, 3. etc. FOR HL7 Balloters ... who have not been part of that multi-year SDPi journey, consider focusing a ballot on specific areas that would follow a similar journey - e.g., starting with general scope and use cases Provide clarity regarding use case descriptions (namely, TF-1C ... mapped to profiles as appropriate)  Perform a "readability" editorial review of the current specification to identify means for facilitating review, commenting and implementation  
    • John Rhoads / Javier Espina : 7-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive
    • 2024JAN

    Description

      This document is too massive to be reviewed. In printed form it is over 220 pages long. It needs to be broken into coherent smaller documents to be reviewed individually. It is impossible to meaningfully read, digest and comment on in its current form in the time provided.

      (Comment 20 - imported by: Ron G. Parker)

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            Rongparker Ron G. Parker
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: