Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Highest
-
Cross-Paradigm Gender Harmony (OTHER)
-
1.0.0-ballot
-
Terminology Infrastructure
-
Terminology
-
13.6
-
-
Rob M / Reuben D : 4-0-0
-
Enhancement
-
Non-substantive
-
current
Description
Even a set of values is not currently available. A directive can be helpful for users in constructing their own valuesets.
It is also a good starting point to encourage stakeholders to share their collections and experience for the future valueset building project.
Existing Wording:
The RSG element is intended to support the exchange of any sex or gender recorded data that is not specifically known to be the gender identity or a needed SFCU. The element allows any code or text that is in the record to be sent as the “recorded value” so no value set or code system is defined for that element. We do provide a value set and use an external code system for sending an international equivalent value in addition to the actual recorded value.
(Comment 79 - imported by: Lloyd McKenzie)
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-44057 Affirmative - Ron G. Parker : 2022-Sep-HL7 IG SEX GENDER R1 STU
- Balloted
- relates to
-
OTHER-2463 Reconsider Recorded Sex and Gender definition/purpose
-
- Triaged
-
-
OTHER-2525 RSG clarity
-
- Triaged
-
-
OTHER-2463 Reconsider Recorded Sex and Gender definition/purpose
-
- Triaged
-