Loading...

XML

Word

Printable

JSON

Specification:

Cross Paradigm Gender Harmony - Sex and Gender Representation (OTHER)
Raised in Version:

1.0.0-ballot
Work Group:

Terminology Infrastructure
Outstanding Negatives:
STU
Related Page(s):

Modeling Sex and Gender Representation [deprecated]
Grouping:
- Block-2023-07-10
- GHP
- RSG
Resolution Description:

Hide

We will update based on RSG Document - link RSG which has the intended text for the model page.

The RSG working document has been added as an attachment within this ticket for reference.

Show
We will update based on RSG Document - link RSG which has the intended text for the model page. The RSG working document has been added as an attachment within this ticket for reference.
Resolution Vote:
MaryKay McDaniel / Christopher Gracon : 6-0-3
Change Category:
Clarification
Change Impact:
Compatible, substantive

The beginning of the RSG section is not as assertattive and clear as the wording found in the FHIR extension derived from RSG.

specifically: "This element is used for existing 'sex' or 'gender' elements in a document or record when the intent and meaning is unclear."

is voted on by

BALLOT-42004 Negative - John Moehrke : 2022-Sep-HL7 IG SEX GENDER R1 STU

relates to

V2-25437 Sex and Gender should not be combined into a single element

OTHER-2415 Consider Splitting Recorded Sex and Gender

FHIR-38861 Consider adding additional guidance on the use of patient.gender vs. RSG extension

OTHER-2637 Provide more guidance for RecordedSexOrGender

OTHER-2478 Recorded Sex or Gender code has nonsensical value set binding

OTHER-2479 Recorded Sex or Gender template lacks value set binding

(2 relates to, 1 mentioned in)