Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
Cross-Paradigm Gender Harmony (OTHER)
-
1.0.0-ballot
-
Terminology Infrastructure
-
STU
-
Modeling Sex and Gender Representation
-
-
Clarification
-
Compatible, substantive
Description
The beginning of the RSG section is not as assertattive and clear as the wording found in the FHIR extension derived from RSG.
specifically: "This element is used for existing 'sex' or 'gender' elements in a document or record when the intent and meaning is unclear."
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-42004 Negative - John Moehrke : 2022-Sep-HL7 IG SEX GENDER R1 STU
- Balloted
- relates to
-
OTHER-2479 Recorded Sex or Gender template lacks value set binding
-
- Triaged
-
-
OTHER-2637 Provide more guidance for RecordedSexOrGender
-
- Resolved - change required
-
-
OTHER-2478 Recorded Sex or Gender code has nonsensical value set binding
-
- Resolved - change required
-
-
V2-25437 Sex and Gender should not be combined into a single element
-
- Resolved - No Change
-
-
OTHER-2415 Consider Splitting Recorded Sex and Gender
-
- Resolved - No Change
-
-
FHIR-38861 Consider adding additional guidance on the use of patient.gender vs. RSG extension
-
- Published
-
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...