Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-43127

There should be a longer or another balloting phase

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Icon: Comment Comment
    • Resolution: Considered - No action required
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • EU Laboratory Report (FHIR)
    • 0.1.0-ballot [deprecated]
    • HL7 Europe
    • A - Laboratory Report
    • Hide

      This is the first STU publication, so there will be time for applying the needed changes and improvements and having new ballots.

      The feedback collection is not ending with this ballot. It is a continuous process; so you can keep on submitting change proposals in Jira.  

      Show
      This is the first STU publication, so there will be time for applying the needed changes and improvements and having new ballots. The feedback collection is not ending with this ballot. It is a continuous process; so you can keep on submitting change proposals in Jira.  

      HL7 Germany ballot comment from Martina Sender (mio42 GmbH, Germany)

      Valid analysis requires more time. It is time-consuming to investigate the complex specification in detail. Users also need time for internal coordination in the working groups. To imagine: mio laboratory basic specification iterations have been going on for more than 2 years.

      Our suggestion would be to extend the balloting phase or to start another balloting as soon as possible (after having worked on the amendments)

            Unassigned Unassigned
            kheitmann Kai U. Heitmann
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: