Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-42678

Allow RequestGroup in order-sign and order-select draftOrders

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • CDS Hooks (FHIR)
    • 2.0 [deprecated]
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • STU
    • Hooks - Order Sign
      Hooks - Order Select
    • hooks
    • Hide

      CDS Hooks doesn't determine which FHIR resources, or elements on those resources represent an order. That's the business of the base FHIR spec. 

      Except when the hook is mandating a specific FHIR resource (e.g. appt-book); we will update the description of each hook's field that contains a Bundle of FHIR resources to remove any reference to specific FHIR versions as well as any substantial list of FHIR resources. 

      For example, we'll update order-select and order-sign's draftorders description to:

      FHIR Bundles of Request resource(s) in the process of being ordered (typically with draft status) (e.g. ServiceRequest)

       

      Show
      CDS Hooks doesn't determine which FHIR resources, or elements on those resources represent an order. That's the business of the base FHIR spec.  Except when the hook is mandating a specific FHIR resource (e.g. appt-book); we will update the description of each hook's field that contains a Bundle of FHIR resources to remove any reference to specific FHIR versions as well as any substantial list of FHIR resources.  For example, we'll update order-select and order-sign's draftorders description to: FHIR Bundles of Request resource(s) in the process of being ordered (typically with draft status) (e.g. ServiceRequest)  
    • Nick Radov / Juliet K Rubini : 9-0-2
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      Since the RequestGroup resource implements the request workflow pattern I think we should allow it in the order-sign and order-select hooks draftOrders field. This would allow additional flexibility when there is a hierarchy of related actions. Or, alternatively, if RequestGroup isn't appropriate in this context then I would appreciate an update to those pages to explain why it was intentionally excluded from the draftOrders field.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            nradov Nick Radov
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: