Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Low
-
US C-CDA on FHIR (FHIR)
-
1.2.0-ballot
-
Cross-Group Projects
-
CF-immunization
-
C-CDA to FHIR Immunizations
-
-
Jay Lyle/John D'Amore: 16-0-6
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
In C-CDA, there is not a clear guidance on using a single timestamp or a date range:
SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] effectiveTime (CONF:1198-8834).
It would be good to add a similar comment as allergies like "effectiveTime/high should not be mapped within occurrenceDateTime".
Perhaps going even further, the fact that this could be in `effectiveTime/@value` or `effectiveTime/low/@value` should be mentioned either here or in the generic CDA <-> FHIR Time/Dates. Something like "Some CDA timestamp can be either a single point-in-time or an interval range. When mapped to a fire dateTime or instant datatype, the value should be taken from either @value or low/@value. If mapped to a FHIR period, effectiveTime/low maps to period.start and effectiveTime/high maps to period.end."
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-49286 Affirmative - Benjamin Flessner : 2023-May-FHIR IG CCDA R1 STU
- Balloted
-
- Balloted
-
- Balloted
-
- Balloted
- relates to
-
-
- Published
-