Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Highest
-
US Core (FHIR)
-
6.0.0-ballot [deprecated]
-
Cross-Group Projects
-
US Core CarePlan Profile
-
Profiles and Extensions
-
-
Eric Haas/Jason Vogt: 12-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Compatible, substantive
Description
Option #4 except:
- Retain CarePlan Text - at least must support and should be derived from structured element if possible
- CarePlan.description could contain a narrative only assessment and plan "A description of the scope and nature of the plan" https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/US-Core/StructureDefinition-us-core-careplan-definitions.html#CarePlan.description
- CarePlan.supportingInfo could hold any resource, so could point to any relevant resource (for example a shift assessment (whatever resource that would) be or a Questionnaire Assessment, or a risk assessment)
- CarePlan.activity.reference is intended to be a PLANNED ACTIVITY and will be renamed as such in R5 - and should hold plans (which should just be pulled into or referenced to the relevant orders, etc
- DO NOT use CarePlan.activity.detail.reasonReference as CarePlan.activity.detail may be removed (see https://jira.hl7.org/browse/FHIR-39101)
- Activity.outcomeReference could be used instead for a performed assessment, as that is intended to be a performed activity and was renamed as such in R5
Attachments
Issue Links
- is duplicated by
-
FHIR-39827 Care Plan option 4b
- Duplicate
-
FHIR-40196 Feedback on CarePlan.text (Seeking ballot comments)
- Duplicate
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-46386 Affirmative - Gay Dolin : 2023-Jan-FHIR US CORE R5.1.0 STU
- Closed
- relates to
-
FHIR-40196 Feedback on CarePlan.text (Seeking ballot comments)
- Duplicate
-
FHIR-32949 Remove requirement for CarePlan.text
- Published