Details
-
Type:
Change Request
-
Status: Applied (View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Highest
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Specification:Clinical Quality Language (FHIR)
-
Raised in Version:1.4
-
Work Group:Clinical Decision Support
-
Related Page(s):Introduction
-
Related Section(s):3.2. Logical Perspective
-
Grouping:
-
Resolution Description:
-
Resolution Vote:Kensaku Kawamoto/Ricardo Quintano: 18-0-0
-
Change Category:Clarification
-
Change Impact:Non-substantive
Description
Figure 1-B: can be improved in several ways:
1. Make horizontal lines dividing different layers between each other.
2. "Physical level" is not the best term here as physical means hardware and binary code is an encoding and is not physical in nature. I would suggest using "Machine level" instead.
3. Distinguish between the data and the transformations/analysis: Make the data into blocks and the analysis actions put onto arrows connecting the data blocks. For instance The CQL expression is connected to the ELM model via an arrow labelled with "Parsing" (Note that lexical analysis or tokenization can be considered as part of parsing).
4. Why do you have two types of trees on the Figure?
5. Why the "z" node is labeled with "symbol(z)" and nodes "x" and "y" are not?
6. What is the meaning of "symbol(z)"?
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-12766 Affirmative - Ricardo Quintano : 2020-May-CQLANG R1 Normative
- Balloted
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...