Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-24553

Performance scales beyond ECOG and KPS - MCODE #136

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Question Question
    • Resolution: Considered - No action required
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Interoperability Council
    • (NA)
    • Landing page - Model
    • Hide

      The only performance status instruments in scope for mCODE 0.9.1 were only KPS and ECOG, determined by the mCODE executive committee.

      Additional performance status instruments will be considered pending use cases and agreement by the mCODE executive committee.

      Proposed resolution: Considered - No action required.

      Show
      The only performance status instruments in scope for mCODE 0.9.1 were only KPS and ECOG, determined by the mCODE executive committee. Additional performance status instruments will be considered pending use cases and agreement by the mCODE executive committee. Proposed resolution: Considered - No action required.
    • MayTerry/Richard Esmond: 14-0-0

    Description

      Comment:

      [Scope and Conceptual Model; Patient Group] Is the patient performance status limited to ECOG and KPS? Are other performance scales also allowed?

      Existing wording: Patient performance status - Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status and/or Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS).

      Proposed wording: Patient performance status -for example Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status and/or Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS).

      Summary:

      Performance scales beyond ECOG and KPS

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            may_terry May Terry
            Gonzaga Zabrina Gonzaga
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: