Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
C-CDA Templates Clinical Notes (CDA)
-
3.0.0-ballot
-
Structured Documents
-
STU
-
Care Plan
-
-
Jean Duteau / Lisa Nelson : 6-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
We fixed CDA-20767 by removing the constraint on a Care Plan's receivedOrganization/name entirely. Technically, this does solve the issue, since now the [1..1] cardinality constraint will carry over from the US Realm Header template... but don't we typically try to explicitly carry over the US Realm Header constraints like that into the document-level templates rather than rely on implementers to know there are other implicit requirements lurking in US Realm Header?
IMO it would be better for the Care Plan to say that the receivedOrganization SHALL have [1..1] name just like US Realm Header does.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-58142 Negative - Christopher Schaut : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61737 Negative - Vassil Peytchev : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61760 Negative - Daniel Rutz : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61781 Negative - Danielle Friend : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61802 Negative - David Sundaram-Stukel : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61824 Negative - Kimberly Herman : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61845 Negative - Cooper Thompson : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61946 Negative - Amit Popat : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61969 Negative - Chris Courville : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...