Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Medium
-
C-CDA Templates Clinical Notes (CDA)
-
3.0.0-ballot
-
Structured Documents
-
STU
-
Care Experience Preference
-
Correction
-
CDA-20943 Add 0..0 @nullFlavor for @code bindings
Description
If code element carries a nullFlavor, should the value element not be present? Seems like there needs to some smarts built into the validator to address this situation where you permit data to be absent for a reason, but also require that information to be coded and included when the data is not absent.
Is there something we can do with constraint language or which the way the FHIR Validator works to make this "commonsense" situation supported without having to add a bunch of work-around constraints? Or do we just need to add some additional constraints?
Attachments
Issue Links
- duplicates
-
CDA-20943 Add 0..0 @nullFlavor for @code bindings
- Applied
- is duplicated by
-
CDA-20889 Care Experience Preference code element should not permit nullFlavors
- Duplicate
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-58055 Negative - Lisa R. Nelson : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Withdrawn
- relates to
-
CDA-20891 Should this design narrow the relevant data absent reasons allowed?
- Resolved - No Change
-
FHIR-43542 Should this design narrow the relevant data absent reasons allowed?
- Resolved - No Change
-
CDA-20889 Care Experience Preference code element should not permit nullFlavors
- Duplicate