Uploaded image for project: 'V2 Specification Feedback'
  1. V2 Specification Feedback
  2. V2-25763

HL7V2-FHIR: MSH-10 Mapping

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • V2 to FHIR (V2)
    • 1.0
    • Orders & Observations
    • Processing Type to FHIR MessageHeader (PT)
    • 18.153.1
    • Hide

      Motion to find not persuasive as this is already mapped to Bundle.identifier that is more suitable.  Given the use and purpose of a .id in FHIR it would not be appropriate to map a business concept to that, rather use a .identifier that is most suitable.  Note that in every message there is a MSH[Bundle] segment included to map, among other things, the Control ID.

      Show
      Motion to find not persuasive as this is already mapped to Bundle.identifier that is more suitable.  Given the use and purpose of a .id in FHIR it would not be appropriate to map a business concept to that, rather use a .identifier that is most suitable.  Note that in every message there is a MSH [Bundle] segment included to map, among other things, the Control ID.
    • Hans Buitendijk / Riki Merrick: 8-0-1

    Description

      http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/v2mappings/2020Sep/ConceptMap-segment-msh-to-messageheader.html

      Existing Wording Proposed Wording Ballot Comment
        MessageHeader.id messageHeader.id is unique for instance of that message, which is some cases could be useful to track. Propose to map message control id to messageheader.id. It will also allow uniqueness of the message maintained at FHIR server level, avoid duplicates post mapping with the use of back-end store.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            shashank.shekhar@philips.com Shashank Shekhar (Inactive)
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: