XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Project Scope Statement Project Scope Statement
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • None
    • Hide

      There is no focused guidance describing the use of HL7 standards (V2 and FHIR) to send at home test results  to local, state, territorial and federal health agencies. While most Public Health systems currently receive only V2 messages, we anticipate a near future where FHIR will be received and processed by Public Health systems. This project will examine the challenges and opportunities of FHIR vs V2 within Public Health using the implementation of the draft IG and will use the HL7 process to gain stakeholder consensus. The scope of the initial IG and that the draft IG is already being implemented in approximately 5 states will lend itself well to testing the waters of FHIR flowing into Public Health Systems.

      Point-of-care (POC) and at-home tests offer increased accessibility to needed diagnostic solutions during a pandemic. Test results have value to the individual taking the tests and also to public health authorities responsible for coordinating a regional and national response. Digital platforms are being developed that allow individual test results, with permission of the individual, to be captured, organized, and transmitted to public health systems. Test manufacturers, working in partnership with these digital platforms, are seeking guidance on where to send test results. With multiple tests already entering the market, there is a need for a unified strategy on data flow of test results from the apps to downstream systems. A national data exchange standard should be supported that guides data exchange from test results residing on individual users’ digital test applications to public health authorities, at both the federal and regional levels.

      Show
      There is no focused guidance describing the use of HL7 standards (V2 and FHIR) to send at home  test results  to local, state, territorial and federal health agencies. While most Public Health systems currently receive only V2 messages, we anticipate a near future where FHIR will be received and processed by Public Health systems. This project will examine the challenges and opportunities of FHIR vs V2 within Public Health using the implementation of the draft IG and will use the HL7 process to gain stakeholder consensus. The scope of the initial IG and that the draft IG is already being implemented in approximately 5 states will lend itself well to testing the waters of FHIR flowing into Public Health Systems. Point-of-care (POC) and at-home tests offer increased accessibility to needed diagnostic solutions during a pandemic. Test results have value to the individual taking the tests and also to public health authorities responsible for coordinating a regional and national response. Digital platforms are being developed that allow individual test results, with permission of the individual, to be captured, organized, and transmitted to public health systems. Test manufacturers, working in partnership with these digital platforms, are seeking guidance on where to send test results. With multiple tests already entering the market, there is a need for a unified strategy on data flow of test results from the apps to downstream systems. A national data exchange standard should be supported that guides data exchange from test results residing on individual users’ digital test applications to public health authorities, at both the federal and regional levels.
    • Orders & Observations
    • Public Health
    • Krishna Juluru, Gay Dolin, Riki Merrick
    • State of Tennessee, North Carolina, and many more are piloting
    • Product Family Product Project Intent Lineage Ballot Type Target Cycle Actions
      1
      FHIR
       
       
       
       
      September 2021
    • At-Home Test Result Report
    • Hide
      Need to be sure to align with other existing Covid FHIR lab profiles/ IGs where appropriate (e.g. When reconciled and published the COVID-19 FHIR Profile Library IG (http://hl7.org/fhir/us/covid19library/2021Sep/index.html)
      Show
      Need to be sure to align with other existing Covid FHIR lab profiles/ IGs where appropriate (e.g. When reconciled and published the COVID-19 FHIR Profile Library IG ( http://hl7.org/fhir/us/covid19library/2021Sep/index.html )
    • Will add a Confluence Page once we get WG sponsorship
    • N/A
    • Yes
    • Yes
    • ONC/NIH
    • Association/Goverment Agency, Consultant, Healthcare IT Vendors, Healthcare Provider/user, Patients, Providers, Standards Development Organizations (SDOs), Vendor/Manufacturer
    • US

    Description

      The purpose of this project is to ballot and publish a framework for At-Home Test Result Reports Implementation Guide (IG). The first iteration of the guide represents Covid At-Home Test Results.

      A draft IG (https://trifolia-fhir.lantanagroup.com/igs/lantana_hapi_r4/homeCovid/index.html) has been developed that describes the use of HL7 FHIR to send at home Covid test results to local, state, territorial and Federal health agencies. Over time other test result types will be profiled.

      An HL7 v2 to FHIR mapping table will also be included in the IG. The project will update and ballot the IGs through open and transparent HL7 ballot process to gain community input and support.

      The draft IG currently constrains the following profiles for the use case of sending results from Covid tests performed at home to public health systems:

      • US Core Laboratory Result Observation
      • US Core Diagnostic Report for Laboratory Results
      • FHIR Observation Resource for
            * Presence or absence of symptoms
            * Date and Time of symptom onset

      The draft IG is currently being piloted in a 3-5 States with plans to pilot in multiple new states in the coming months. You can find more information about current piloting efforts utilizing this IG at https://www.nibib.nih.gov/covid-at-home-test-result-reporting-standards-analysis.

      This FHIR implementation guide will use the US Core profiles. If this FHIR implementation guide is unable to use a US Core profile, we will follow the Cross Group Projects WG's variance request process, and provide the US Realm Steering Committee an approved rationale for deviation in the implementation guide where applicable.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            GDolin Gay Dolin
            Matthew Rahn Matthew Rahn
            Matthew Rahn Matthew Rahn
            Gay Dolin Gay Dolin
            Watchers:
            24 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: