-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Highest
-
AI Data Lifecycle (Phase I: Data Used for Machine Learning Models) (OTHER)
-
1.0-ballot
-
Electronic Health Record
-
Background
-
-
Gary Dickinson / John Ritter: 5-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
-
1.0-ballot
We suggest using/incorporating the work of OECD and/or NIST for the lifecycle phases of both AI systems/projects and AI/ML data. OECD's AI definitions, principles, etc have been widely recognized and developed with government, industry and civil society stakeholders from multiple countries. NIST's work is also recognized more broadly than the USG, and their public comment process is open to any/all input from around the world.
https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/NIST.AI.100-1.pdf (See figure 2 and its discussion, which is modified from OECD Framework for the Classification of AI systems:
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/cb6d9eca-en.pdf?expires=1705442183&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=937442169F5D0E48F8E5F3A38C500EE7 )
(Comment 13 - imported by: Hans Buitendijk)
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-58207 Negative - Hans Buitendijk : 2024-Jan-HL7 AI DATA LIFECYCLE E1 Inform
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-59762 Negative - Frank Oemig - Cerner : 2024-Jan-HL7 AI DATA LIFECYCLE E1 Inform
- Balloted