Uploaded image for project: 'Other Specification Feedback'
  1. Other Specification Feedback
  2. OTHER-2632

Not enough time for community review. Ballot process and content too complicated for community review by non-technical people..

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • Cross Paradigm Gender Harmony - Sex and Gender Representation (OTHER)
    • 1.0.0-ballot
    • Terminology Infrastructure
    • Home
    • All
    • Hide

      Concerns noted but the ballot process is defined by ANSI and HL7, not this work group. Plus the subject is indeed complicated.

      Show
      Concerns noted but the ballot process is defined by ANSI and HL7, not this work group. Plus the subject is indeed complicated.
    • MaryKay McDaniel / Sean Muir: 9-0-2

    Description

      With respect, if there is a vote to the balloting process we would vote NEGATIVE. The R5 ballot package was posted on Sep 16 but the correct Gender identity value set was not posted until Sep 29. With the submission deadline of Oct 7 for the community and Oct 13 for HL7 Canada, we think the timing was too tight for such a complex ballot. If HL7 wants meaningful community participation it needs to make a greater effort to make the ballot content and process easier to understand and follow; currently they are too complicated for non-technical people to take part meaningfully.

      (Comment 74 - imported by: Lloyd McKenzie)

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            Rongparker Ron G. Parker
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: