Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive
-
Highest
-
Cross Paradigm Gender Harmony - Sex and Gender Representation (OTHER)
-
1.0.0-ballot
-
Terminology Infrastructure
-
Model
-
3.2.3
-
-
Carol Macumber / MaryKay McDaniel : 5-0-0
Description
For many clinical uses limiting sex to male or female (or specified) makes sense – drugs are dosed for, or approriate for males and females differently; radiation shielding must be placed differently; baseline lab results may differ; surgery will depend on specific organs. However, in psychiatry and similar situations, might there be a need for more nuanced SFCU? I understand the need for a small selection of SFCU values to drive decision making, and that using values other than M/F in contexts where the only reasonable SFCUs are M/F will cause confusion; however, please consider whether the SFCU valueset should be expanded
(Comment 63 - imported by: Lloyd McKenzie)
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-44041 Affirmative - Ron G. Parker : 2022-Sep-HL7 IG SEX GENDER R1 STU
- Balloted