Uploaded image for project: 'Other Specification Feedback'
  1. Other Specification Feedback
  2. OTHER-2559

No need for gender harmony profiles.

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • Cross Paradigm Gender Harmony - Sex and Gender Representation (OTHER)
    • 1.0.0-ballot
    • Terminology Infrastructure
    • Home
    • 1.1.2
    • Hide

      No change in spec is actually required, but unable to resolve the comment without making the resolution Not Persuasive.

      Group agrees that there should not be any profiles within the IG. This does not require a change, but resolution should be 'agree', vs. Resolved - Change Required. No change is actually required.

       

      Show
      No change in spec is actually required, but unable to resolve the comment without making the resolution Not Persuasive. Group agrees that there should not be any profiles within the IG. This does not require a change, but resolution should be 'agree', vs. Resolved - Change Required. No change is actually required.  
    • Riki U / Lorraine C : 10-0-0

    Description

      There is no need for profiles within this IG. All extensions are already usable on the appropriate resources, so profiling doesn't add that capability. Profiles should also not be used to drive behaviour (we should not handle a "Pronouned Patient Profile" instance differently than a Patient with the pronoun extension that doesn't claim that profile). Defining a profile mandating use of all extensions is restrictive without a specific context. Defining multiple profiles each mandating a single extension would lead to users having to define their own profiles combining our profiles in the ways they need, which doesn't provide an advantage over them directly mandating use of the extensions (and causes challenges because tooling doesn't support multiple profile inheritance). Profiles allowing/mandating SFCU are useless absent a particular clinical use (e.g., certain types of ServiceRequests) which are not present in this IG. Leave profiling to derivative IGs.

      (Comment 1 - imported by: Lloyd McKenzie)

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            Rongparker Ron G. Parker
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: