Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive
-
Highest
-
Cross Paradigm Gender Harmony - Sex and Gender Representation (OTHER)
-
1.0.0-ballot
-
Terminology Infrastructure
-
STU
-
CDA Gender Harmony
FHIR Guidance
V2 Gender Harmony -
All
-
-
Cooper T / Riki M : 13-1-0
Description
- Seems like this formulation rests on the short side of the 80%/20% rule - particularly as we might consider the sensibilities of most nations and peoples. Maybe it should be offered as specific to particular realms or interest groups.
- Seems like HL7 should take care not to instantiate personal preferences (e.g., pronouns) that carry no clinical significance or consequence - except where the consequence (and potential penalty) could be applied to those who might consciously (/knowingly) or unconsciously (/unknowingly) fail to apply those preferences in every case. For example, "we require (/mandate) that you (the provider/clinician) use only preferred pronouns in verbal and written statements, notes and communications with and about the patient - under penalty of ...".
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-41786 Negative - Gary Dickinson : 2022-Sep-HL7 IG SEX GENDER R1 STU
- Balloted
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...