Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Medium
-
Cross Paradigm Gender Harmony - Sex and Gender Representation (OTHER)
-
1.0.0-ballot
-
Terminology Infrastructure
-
STU
-
FHIR Guidance
-
11.4 Backwards Compatitbility
-
-
Rob McClure / Davera Gabriel : 5-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
We only recommend using the individual-recordedSexOrGender extension in the case where creating a use-case specific extension or property is not practical.
Personally I don't think that is a good idea, as it will create a mulitude of profiles / extensions (even within the US) potentially for the same use case in the absence of a corrdinatign body to facilitate this work - in V2 we specifically created a separate segment to accommodate reporting of ANY recorded Sex or Gender the same way and it would improve cross-mapping between HL7 product families, if FHIR adopts that approach as well.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-41593 Negative - Ulrike Merrick : 2022-Sep-HL7 IG SEX GENDER R1 STU
- Withdrawn