Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-44764

Change binding on Sex Extension's value set from required to extensible?

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US Core (FHIR)
    • current
    • Cross-Group Projects
    • US Core Sex Extension
    • Hide

      Change the binding strength to extensible

      Show
      Change the binding strength to extensible
    • Brett Marquard/Eric Haas: 17-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Compatible, substantive

    Description

      On the 2024-02-15 Structured Docs call, we agreed in CDA-21060 to add a new concept to the Sex value set (as used by the Sex Extension) to capture the concept of a person's sex (for example, on a legal document) being something like "X" or "nonbinary."

      We also decided that it might even be worth changing the binding on the value set from "required" to "extensible;" this ticket exists to track that follow-up discussion.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            mszczepa Matt Szczepankiewicz
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: