Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-44518

Clarify differing workflow/data requirements for Use Cases 1, 2, and 4

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • US Respiratory Virus Hospitalization Surveillance Network (RESP-NET) FHIR IG (FHIR)
    • 1.0.0-ballot
    • Public Health
    • STU
    • Use Cases
    • 2.5 and 2.7
    • Hide

      Since this IG is meant for developers of specific use cases (not all states participate in each use case), we feel it is important to keep the use cases separate for easier implementation. Use Case 1 does have a different workflow and will be updated.

      Show
      Since this IG is meant for developers of specific use cases (not all states participate in each use case), we feel it is important to keep the use cases separate for easier implementation. Use Case 1 does have a different workflow and will be updated.
    • Becky Angeles / Craig Newman : 31-0-0
    • Clarification
    • Compatible, substantive

    Description

      Clarify whether there are differing workflow and/or data requirements for Use Case 1,2,4. Upon initial review, workflows are the exact same, aside from different diagnosis codes/lab results causing the initial notification of the HDEA. Suggest condensing use cases for ease of review if there are no substantial differences in technical workflow or payload. 

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            mrahn Matthew Rahn
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: