Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
US Core (FHIR)
-
7.0.0-ballot
-
Cross-Group Projects
-
US Core Jurisdiction Extension
-
-
Eric Haas/Jason Vogt: 25-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
When reviewing FHIR US Core there was no reference anywhere that I could find where the US Core Jurisdiction Extension is included. There is a clear statement on where it can be used, but the Identifier data type already has an assigner, which should reflect the jurisdiction that assigns the identifier. It is unclear from the definition why the address of the organization assigning the identifier.
Note that Device already has a jurisdiction (Included in .udiCarrier) which is not yet included in US Core and is actually explicitly a .uri data type.
We therefore suggest to either remove this extension and reconsider its datatype and appropriateness as a global extension for any identifier and align with Device.udiCarrier.jurisdiction OR clarify why this is not the same as the Device.jurisdiction and cannot use Identifier.assigner(Organization.address.state) OR change the data type to uri to be aligned with Device.jurisdiction which is also used for an identifier indicating the jurisdiction according to which the UDI was issued.
As there is no USCDI requirement for this, and unless there is another clear pressing need, suggest to remove and reconsider.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-57996 Negative - Hans Buitendijk : 2024-Jan-FHIR US CORE E7 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-60158 Negative - Frank Oemig - Cerner : 2024-Jan-FHIR US CORE E7 STU
- Balloted