Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
US Core (FHIR)
-
7.0.0-ballot
-
Cross-Group Projects
-
US Core Specimen Profile
-
-
Brett Marquard/Hans Buitendijk: 21-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
We note that the short description and comments of Specimen.condition in the US Core profile ("Specimen condition acceptability") are substantially different than in the core Specimen resource's .condition definition and description ("State of the specimen", "A mode or state of being that describes the nature of the specimen." , "The specimen condition can be used to assess its quality or appropriateness for a specific test.", and "Specimen condition is an observation made about the specimen. It's a point-in-time assessment. It can be used to assess its quality or appropriateness for a specific test.").
The condition is about the specimen itself, not about the suitability and acceptability for a particular test. We suggest that US Core reflects in the attribute definition the correct meaning of Specimen.condition and describes in a comment (not short description or definition) that the specimen condition can be used (input) to assess the acceptability of the specimen for a particular test.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-57990 Negative - Hans Buitendijk : 2024-Jan-FHIR US CORE E7 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-60164 Negative - Frank Oemig - Cerner : 2024-Jan-FHIR US CORE E7 STU
- Balloted