Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
US Da Vinci ATR (FHIR)
-
2.0.0-ballot
-
Financial Mgmt
-
ATRGroup
DaVinci Patient List -
Use Cases and Overview
-
2.5. Member Attribution List Exchange for Scenario #2 (STU2 Workflow)
-
-
Nagesh Bashyam/Paul Knapp: 15-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
Background:
This question is specifically referring to Step #2 (yellow circle on diagram) of the STU2 Workflow.
Question:
Based on how the IG STU 2.0 details out there is no mention of creating a Group resource, it is always the Davinci Patient List. Also from a Payer stand point this will have implications. Should the EMR's be able to create a ATRGroup resource in the Payer system? Or should the EMRs only be able to send the Patient List to the Payer and the Payer would create the Group within the payer's FHIR system?