Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-42804

Package Operation type + examples for different types

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • Canonical Resource Management Infrastructure (FHIR)
    • current
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • CRMI Package Operation
    • Home
    • nav menu
    • Hide

      The `include` parameter is intended to support different use cases like this, we will add documentation to the operation to make clear this intent.

      In addition, there is a planned "capabilities" parameter that will support referencing CapabilityStatement and TerminologyCapabilities resources to further describe expectations for the target package.

      Show
      The `include` parameter is intended to support different use cases like this, we will add documentation to the operation to make clear this intent. In addition, there is a planned "capabilities" parameter that will support referencing CapabilityStatement and TerminologyCapabilities resources to further describe expectations for the target package.
    • Floyd Eisenberg/Greg White: 13-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Compatible, substantive

    Description

      My understanding is that the package operation would be used to e.g. prepare a questionnaire and all that is needed for displaying and testing (structureMaps, valuesets etc). 

      Another type of package would for measures. 

      Another could be for test data

      Another would be for semantic validation (getting a logical model, its dependencies, valuesets, invariants, extensions, conceptmaps).

      How are these types of packages defined? I would expect the following:

      a) getting all dependencies may not be a good choice as some dependencies may be irrelevant for some purposes.

      b) relying only on the resource type may not be sufficient as different resource types may serve completely different purposes (e.g. structuredefs).

      Would we have a type for these? 

      How can we produce all these packages from an ig?

       

      This issue is being raised as a consequence of trying to do something simple as packaging a questionnaire for debugging a structuremap - turns out to be minute work, complicated, tedious and prone to issues. If the package operation is to support that, we can push it as part of the expected tools.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            costateixeira Jose Costa-Teixeira
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: