Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-42729

Broader Definition of Marital Status Needed

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US Vital Records Death Reporting (VRDR) (FHIR)
    • current
    • Public Health
    • Artifacts Summary
    • Hide

      This valueset has moved to the Vital Records Common LIbrary.
      Add Domestic Partnership to ValueSet.
      Note that NCHS will treat Domestic Partnership as 'Not Classifiable' (U).

      See FHIR-44998

      Show
      This valueset has moved to the Vital Records Common LIbrary. Add Domestic Partnership to ValueSet. Note that NCHS will treat Domestic Partnership as 'Not Classifiable' (U). See FHIR-44998
    • Robert Passas/Saul Kravitz : 25-0-0
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive
    • Yes

    Description

      I wanted to raise a couple questions to this community around the Marital Status value set - and specifically when a concept is defined in the HL7 Terminology but not in the VRDR FHIR IG.

      Context:
      According to current IJE Mortality File Layout, the value set for Marital Status includes:

      M = Married
      A = Married but Separated
      W = Widowed
      D = Divorced
      S = Never Married
      U = Not Classifiable

      These concepts are represented in the VRDR FHIR IG as:
      D = Divorced
      L = Legally Separated
      M = Married
      S = Never Married
      W = Widowed
      UNK = unknown

      In the HL7 Terminology, there is a higher level of specificity. For example, Domestic Partner is defined as T.

      I'm wondering -
      • Do other jurisdictions use Domestic Partner and/or expect to see it included in the VRDR FHIR IG?
      • NCHS team - could you help me understand why the VRDR FHIR IG limits values that are already defined in the HL7 Terminology?

      I'm not sure if this topic has already been raised or addressed. Would love to hear some thoughts about this.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            saul_kravitz Saul Kravitz
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: