Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-42568

Why so much discussion about VSAC in an international spec?

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • Canonical Resource Management Infrastructure (FHIR)
    • 1.0.0-ballot [deprecated]
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • Using Cql [deprecated]
    • 18.4
    • Hide

      Agreed, generalize discussion that references VSAC to ensure it is being referenced as an example of a terminology service.

      Note though that it is the case that VSAC is in the process of implementing the packaging capabilities and terminology service capabilities described here.

      Show
      Agreed, generalize discussion that references VSAC to ensure it is being referenced as an example of a terminology service. Note though that it is the case that VSAC is in the process of implementing the packaging capabilities and terminology service capabilities described here.
    • Daryl Chertcoff/Chris Schuler: 12-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      VSAC is U.S.-specific (and unlikely to follow our packaging rules any time soon), so why talk about it here?

      (Comment 28 - imported by: Lloyd McKenzie)

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            lloyd Lloyd McKenzie
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: