While it makes sense to clarify a "source of truth" when informal items (like examples) are involved, we do not feel we can accurately clarify a "source of truth" between different formal parts of the specification. Any discrepancy between formal parts of the spec is unintended. Given that they have equal authority, we cannot determine ahead of time which is "more correct". It would be better for these discrepancies to be surfaced in the community, decided upon, and addressed via a technical correction. Furthermore, the FSH specification contains a fair amount of intended redundancy for the sake of usability (e.g., to prevent users from needing to constantly jump all over the specification, to support summaries of information, to minimize context-switching, etc). As such, it would be quite difficult, and possibly distracting, to identify every instance of redundant information and clarify a single source of truth for it.