Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Highest
-
US C-CDA on FHIR (FHIR)
-
1.2.0-ballot
-
Cross-Group Projects
-
STU
-
CF-problem
-
C-CDA to FHIR Problems
-
-
Jay Lyle/John D'Amore: 18-0-6
-
Enhancement
-
Non-substantive
Description
The status of the Problem Concern Act is separate from the clinical status of the problem itself. So the row in the table about using the @statusCode is incorrect.
The table doesn't actually clarify the difference between this row and the latter row that does map the Problem Status Observation, though removing this (@statusCode-based) row entirely will help.
Additionally - status is determined by the presence & value of an abatementDate; so a note could be added to the row on Problem Status that - if the Problem Status observation is not present, then clinicalStatus can be inferred by the presence or absence of /effectiveTime/high (either @value or @nullFlavor).
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-49354 Negative - Benjamin Flessner : 2023-May-FHIR IG CCDA R1 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-49464 Negative - Mike Paetz : 2023-May-FHIR IG CCDA R1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-49515 Negative - Nick Hatt : 2023-May-FHIR IG CCDA R1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-49575 Negative - Matthew Moore : 2023-May-FHIR IG CCDA R1 STU
- Balloted
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...