Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-40698

Should we add VisionPrescription back?

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US Da Vinci CRD (FHIR)
    • 1.0.0 [deprecated]
    • Financial Mgmt
    • Supported Hooks
    • Hide

      Will add back as supported (optional) for the various 'order'-related hooks.

      Will put mustSupport on: identifier, patient, dateWritten, status, prescriber, everything in lensSpecification except the last 3.

      Show
      Will add back as supported (optional) for the various 'order'-related hooks. Will put mustSupport on: identifier, patient, dateWritten, status, prescriber, everything in lensSpecification except the last 3.
    • Bob Dieterle / Mark Scrimshire : 4-0-1
    • Enhancement
    • Compatible, substantive
    • Yes

    Description

      The decision in R5 is that VisionPrescription will remain - though it will hopefully get updated further in R6 to better align with the Request pattern.

      Therefore, we can't count on systems using DeviceRequest to represent orders for eyeware.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            lloyd Lloyd McKenzie
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: