Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-40289

Solve device conformance to standard "options"

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • R5
    • Orders & Observations
    • Device
      DeviceDefinition

    Description

      The recently renamed (in response to FHIR-39242) conformsTo elements in both Device and DeviceDefinition allow documenting conformance claims. However there is an outstanding issue from that tracker for documenting sub-standard conformance, including IHE Actor and Named Option conformance; DICOM SOP class conformance; other option capabilities in standards; and applicable clauses in regulation.

      Options for addressing these could be: the standard vocabulary used includes both the standard and options; new elements for options (and sub-options); and extensions for options and sub-options.

      Clarify how these should be handled, and if necessary update the resource structures and narratives, or create extensions.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            esilver Elliot Silver
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated: