Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-39980

When do you use the Group Improvement Notation over the MeasureReport Improvement Notation

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US Da Vinci DEQM (FHIR)
    • 4.0.0-ballot
    • Clinical Quality Information
    • STU
    • Profiles and Extensions
    • Hide

      There are invariants (deqm-2 and deqm-4) on Individual and Summary MeasureReport profiles to ensure a MeasureReport can either have improvement notation at the root or at the group level. 

      Agreed to add language to the DEQM Group Improvement Notation Extension profile introduction notes to clarify. 

      Also need to make sure to look at other extensions to include the same clarifications. 

      Show
      There are invariants (deqm-2 and deqm-4) on Individual and Summary MeasureReport profiles to ensure a MeasureReport can either have improvement notation at the root or at the group level.  Agreed to add language to the DEQM Group Improvement Notation Extension profile introduction notes to clarify.  Also need to make sure to look at other extensions to include the same clarifications. 
    • Bryn Rhodes / Stan Rankins : 11-0-3
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      Improvement Notation can exist at both the MeasureReport and the MeasureReport.group with the extension.  Should only one be used?  Which one takes precedence if both present.  Need clarity added to extension I believe

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            yanheras Yan Heras
            lmichaelsen Linda Michaelsen
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: