Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive
-
Highest
-
FHIR Core (FHIR)
-
R5
-
Patient Administration
-
Terminologies - Systems
-
4.3.2.188
-
-
Rob McClure / Brian Postlethwaite : 8-0-2
Description
For many clinical uses limiting sex to male or female (or specified) makes sense – drugs are dosed for, or approriate for males and females differently; radiation shielding must be placed differently; baseline lab results may differ; surgery will depend on specific organs. However, in psychiatry and similar situations, might there be a need for more nuanced SFCU? I understand the need for a small selection of SFCU values to drive decision making, and that using values other than M/F in contexts where the only reasonable SFCUs are M/F will cause confusion; however, please consider whether the SFCU valueset should be expanded
(Comment 7 - imported by: Ron G. Parker)
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-42059 Affirmative - Ron G. Parker : 2022-Sep-FHIR R5 STU
- Closed
-
BALLOT-43507 Affirmative - Ken Sinn : 2022-Sep-FHIR R5 STU
- Closed
-
BALLOT-43559 Affirmative - Joan Harper : 2022-Sep-FHIR R5 STU
- Closed