Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-38592

Concerned about the need for human intervention if the patient matching tech isn't built out

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Highest
    • US Da Vinci CDex (FHIR)
    • 2.0.0-ballot
    • Patient Care
    • STU
    • Direct Query
    • 3.3
    • Hide

      See FHIR-38318

      (This tracker is a duplicate of applied issue FHIR-38318 but its status did not update properly to "Applied" in Jira.)

      Show
      See FHIR-38318 (This tracker is a duplicate of applied issue FHIR-38318 but its status did not update properly to "Applied" in Jira.)
    • Eric Haas / Jay Lyle : 13-0-3
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      Slightly concerned that the FHIR id is a prerequisite to the search but has limited support. Part of the benefit of direct query is the lack of human intervention. But it is unclear from this that retrieving it might not require manual look ups? What would the Data Consumer have to do they cannot find the identifier? This should be explicitly stated. Seems that the same issue is in the Task Based approach.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              Unassigned Unassigned
              celine_lefebvre Celine Lefebvre
              Celine Lefebvre
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: