Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
-
Highest
-
US Da Vinci CDex (FHIR)
-
2.0.0-ballot
-
Patient Care
-
STU
-
Background
-
2.5
-
-
Eric Haas/Jay Lyle: 7-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
The examples in section 2.5 suggest that Cdex is a catch-all for any use case where people aren't using the more appropriate/specific guide. We are concerned physicians will have to deal with attachment requests because payers haven't built out sophisticated CRD or DTR. Do we need language here indicating to protect against Cdex being a way to bypass implementation of more appropriate guides?
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-39915 Negative - Celine Lefebvre : 2022-Sep-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Balloted