Agreed, that the Library description is important, but this profile is actually a derived profile from US Public Health Value Set Library, we should establish the preferred description there, and the commenters proposed description is good: Library.description:comments ( https://hl7.org/fhir/us/ph-library/2022Sep/StructureDefinition-us-ph-valueset-library-definitions.html#Library.description ) Current: This description can be used to capture details such as why the library was built, comments about misuse, instructions for clinical use and interpretation, literature references, examples from the paper world, etc. It is not a rendering of the library as conveyed in the 'text' field of the resource itself. This item SHOULD be populated unless the information is available from context (e.g. the language of the library is presumed to be the predominant language in the place the library was created). Proposed: The description should succinctly and lucidly state the scope of the value sets included (the domains covered with as much specificity as to make the collection unique) and the intended use of the collection (a sense of what guides can use the collection). Also agree that the examples could use work (will consider using the RCTC example value set library from the eCR IG - otherwise will update current examples/add new examples).