Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-38146

at least insufficient, probably unnecessary

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US Da Vinci CDex (FHIR)
    • 1.1.0
    • STU
    • Solicited and Unsolicited Attachments

    Description

      This lone sentence:
      >In all of these cases, the Payer will require a trading partner agreement for sending attachments based on predefined rules.

      Implies that other integrations don't require a "trading partner agreement", and that the provider does not require a "trading partner agreement".

      Also, you don't define what a "trading partner agreement is". Is such an agreement required because this specification says it is?

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            Isaac.Vetter Isaac Vetter
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: