Details
-
Question
-
Resolution: Considered - Question answered
-
Medium
-
US Da Vinci HRex (FHIR)
-
current
-
Clinical Interoperability Council
-
(NA)
-
Description
See FHIR-26212:
We deferred this question and responded at the time:
IN this IG we are specifying a simple more FHIR RESTful operation based approach see
FHIR-26098.This constrained form of messaging is currently supported only by this IG. Agree that after publication and general vetting of the approach the exchange pattern content should should be merged into the Da Vinci hrex IG and referenced from it in a future version of this IG."When should this pattern be considered for hrex.
We are not aware of any other DV guides that treat notifications using FHIR messaging like the Notifications guide and don't think it is appropriate at this time to generalize this solution. But we should have some guidelines when it would be appropriate to move into HRex, and generally when to use HRex vs a "one-solution"?
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
FHIR-26212 New IG for messaging fundamentals
- Triaged
-
FHIR-26212 New IG for messaging fundamentals
- Triaged