Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
US Da Vinci HRex (FHIR)
-
1.0.0
-
Clinical Interoperability Council
-
(NA)
-
-
Lloyd McKenzie/Jimmy Tcheng: 9-0-0
-
Enhancement
-
Compatible, substantive
-
Yes
Description
Should reference type be constrained to FHIR Ids or allow identifiers or display only or all three?
resourceType: Coverage
id: min
status: active
subscriberId: '97531'
beneficiary:
reference: 'http://example.org/new-payer/fhir/Patient/pat1'
payor:
- reference: Organization/min #<<<<<< FHIR ID
#==========================================================
resourceType: Coverage
id: min
status: active
subscriberId: '97531'
beneficiary:
reference: 'http://example.org/new-payer/fhir/Patient/pat1'
payor:
- identifier: #<<<<<< business identifier
value: urn:uuid:a76d9bbf-f293-4fb7-ad4c-2851cac77162
#==========================================================
resourceType: Coverage
id: min
status: active
subscriberId: '97531'
beneficiary:
reference: 'http://example.org/new-payer/fhir/Patient/pat1'
payor:
- display: My Organization #<<<<<< display
Propose guidance to use FHIR Ids and discourage use of only Identifier or display to promote interoperability in FHIR.
Attachments
Issue Links
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...