Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-37250

data consumer?

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • US Da Vinci CDex (FHIR)
    • 1.1.0-ballot [deprecated]
    • Patient Care
    • STU
    • Exchanging Clinical Data [deprecated]
    • 3.1
    • Hide
      1. We will use the term "Data Consumer" (which aligns with Da Vinci HRex) where is applicable for both Payer and Provider system and Payer for  when is really only the Payer system (or an intermediary on behalf of a payer)
      2. define these terms and how they are used in the guide.
      Show
      We will use the term "Data Consumer" (which aligns with Da Vinci HRex) where is applicable for both Payer and Provider system and Payer for  when is really only the Payer system (or an intermediary on behalf of a payer) define these terms and how they are used in the guide.
    • Eric Haas/Laura Heermann-Langford: 7-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      We find this confusing. Is there not a better way to capture the term data consumer instead of "payer" which is not only confusing as providers aren't payers, but because FHIR's financial module defines 'payer' as a public or private insurer.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            celine_lefebvre Celine Lefebvre
            Celine Lefebvre
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: