Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
-
Highest
-
US Da Vinci CDex (FHIR)
-
1.0.0
-
Patient Care
-
Attachments
-
3.4.1.1
-
-
Eric Haas/Jay Lyle:9-0-1
-
Correction
-
Non-substantive
Description
Why does the Solicited Workflow only account for non-FHIR request? Is the intent to never support FHIR for solicited requests as defined in the financial module attachment guidance (hl7.org/fhir/financial-module.html#attachments)? This guidance specifically calls out solicited scenario with the CommunicationRequest resource from an insurer asking for more information. If there is a clear rationale for not choosing to not consider it/align to guidance in the base spec - it should be clearly stated.
(Comment 4 - imported by: Ron G. Parker)
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-35373 Negative - Ron G. Parker : 2022-May-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Closed
-
BALLOT-36563 Negative - Elliot Silver : 2022-May-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Closed
-
BALLOT-36634 Negative - Ken Sinn : 2022-May-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Closed
-
BALLOT-36724 Negative - Joan Harper : 2022-May-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Closed
-
BALLOT-36552 Negative - Sheridan Cook : 2022-May-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Retracted