Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-36853

Various Points Seem to be on the same line when describing that implementers should support JWS JSON Serialization, meaning is unclear

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Technical Correction Technical Correction
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US Da Vinci CDex (FHIR)
    • 1.1.0-ballot [deprecated]
    • Patient Care
    • Signatures
    • Digital Signature Rules For CDEX FHIR Bundles
    • Hide

      This is a formatting error the output should be a list as commetner stated"

       

      SHOULD support JWS JSON Serialization format to represent multiple signatures with all parameter values identical except "x5c"

      • The signer may have more than one certificate (for example, the signer participates in more than one trust community.

      SHALL use X.509 certificates to verify the identity of the entity signing the Bundle

      • The KeyUsage should include ‘DigitalSignature’
      • The Issuer should be a trusted CA for the Consumer
      • The Subject (or Subject Alternative Name (SAN)) should match the data Source
      • The Validity Dates should be appropriate/long enough as determined by the business partners.

       

      Show
      This is a formatting error the output should be a list as commetner stated"   SHOULD  support  JWS JSON Serialization  format to represent multiple signatures with all parameter values identical except  "x5c" The signer may have more than one certificate (for example, the signer participates in more than one trust community. SHALL use X.509 certificates to verify the identity of the entity signing the Bundle The KeyUsage should include ‘DigitalSignature’ The Issuer should be a trusted CA for the Consumer The Subject (or Subject Alternative Name (SAN)) should match the data Source The Validity Dates should be appropriate/long enough as determined by the business partners.  
    • Correction

    Description

      The specification of how implementers should support JWS JSON Serialization seems to have had some other statements appended to it ... SHALL use X.509 certificates seems to be part of the Should support statement, but it seems like you want this to be a separate line.

      This is unclear and should be clarified.

      Also, it looks like there are several numbered entries all mashed into the same sentence.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            zsilber Zack Silber
            Michael Donnelly
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: