Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-36552

Add definition of Must Support

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US Da Vinci CRD (FHIR)
    • 1.0.0 [deprecated]
    • Financial Mgmt
    • STU
    • Supported Hooks
    • Hide

      We will define 'mustSupport' in CRD as follows:

      For CRD clients, if the client maintains the data element and surfaces it to users, then it SHALL be exposed in their FHIR interface when the data exists and privacy constraints permit.

      For CRD services, the server SHALL leverage mustSupport elements as available and appropriate to provide decision support.

      NOTE: These requirements are somewhat different from US-Core and HRex because the implementation needs are different.  In US-Core, there is generally an expectation for clients to modify code and persistence layers to add support mustSupport elements for supported profiles.  This expectation does not hold for CRD.  However, CRD does require surfacing elements in the FHIR interface if the system maintains the element.

      Show
      We will define 'mustSupport' in CRD as follows: For CRD clients, if the client maintains the data element and surfaces it to users, then it SHALL be exposed in their FHIR interface when the data exists and privacy constraints permit. For CRD services, the server SHALL leverage mustSupport elements as available and appropriate to provide decision support. NOTE: These requirements are somewhat different from US-Core and HRex because the implementation needs are different.  In US-Core, there is generally an expectation for clients to modify code and persistence layers to add support mustSupport elements for supported profiles.  This expectation does not hold for CRD.  However, CRD does require surfacing elements in the FHIR interface if the system maintains the element.
    • Bob Dieterle / Chris Cioffi : 8-0-0
    • Clarification
    • Compatible, substantive

    Description

      This IG does not have a clear and easily findable definition of Must Support. This should be added the Formal Specification and should point to the (soon to be published) HRex 1.0.0. Must Support definition.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            corey_spears Corey Spears
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: