Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-36457

No path forward beyond 278, SLAs

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • US Da Vinci PAS (FHIR)
    • 1.2.0-ballot [deprecated]
    • Financial Mgmt
    • STU
    • PAS Timing
      X12 278 Diagnosis Code Value Set
    • (many)
    • many
    • Hide

      Removal of the 278 ceiling would solve this issue. However, the IG is silent on how we move from the HIPAA required Prior Authorization and Notification Inquiry (278) transaction to the FHIR based approach.
      (Response):
      The way to remove the 278 ceiling is via legislation which the requestor is used to pursue. The ability to remove the requirement for the 278 short of legislation is not available.

      Determinations are expected to be made within 15 seconds. The 15 seconds is represented in a specification diagram, but not a written service level agreement. Further, as currently architected, the provider Health IT system is in the critical path of the response time and creating an SLA for multi-party transactions is difficult.
      (Response):
      The 15 second requirement is for compliance with this implementation guide is not an SLA that may be created between trading partners.

      Pended Status checking can be done either by Polling or Subscription, neither of which have a linked IG.
      (Response):
      Poling does not have an Implementation Guide. There is an Implementation Guide for subscription, and we do include a link in section 5.2.4.2.

      Process enablers such as ability to update or cancel the prior authorization have not been fully addressed.
      (Response):
      Details around cancelling and modify are in Section 5.2.6

      Show
      Removal of the 278 ceiling would solve this issue. However, the IG is silent on how we move from the HIPAA required Prior Authorization and Notification Inquiry (278) transaction to the FHIR based approach. (Response): The way to remove the 278 ceiling is via legislation which the requestor is used to pursue. The ability to remove the requirement for the 278 short of legislation is not available. Determinations are expected to be made within 15 seconds. The 15 seconds is represented in a specification diagram, but not a written service level agreement. Further, as currently architected, the provider Health IT system is in the critical path of the response time and creating an SLA for multi-party transactions is difficult. (Response): The 15 second requirement is for compliance with this implementation guide is not an SLA that may be created between trading partners. Pended Status checking can be done either by Polling or Subscription, neither of which have a linked IG. (Response): Poling does not have an Implementation Guide. There is an Implementation Guide for subscription, and we do include a link in section 5.2.4.2. Process enablers such as ability to update or cancel the prior authorization have not been fully addressed. (Response): Details around cancelling and modify are in Section 5.2.6
    • Bob Dieterle / Rachael Foerster : 8-0-0

    Description

      • The IG supports the continued use of the 278 and assumes translation of the 278 into and out of FHIR by some mechanism, whether by clearing house, by a payer, or by a provider system. This translation is included only because 278 is a current regulatory ceiling, not because it is an appropriate approach. Removal of the 278 ceiling would solve this issue. However, the IG is silent on how we move from the HIPAA required Prior Authorization and Notification Inquiry (278) transaction to the FHIR based approach.
      • Determinations are expected to be made within 15 seconds. The 15 seconds is represented in a specification diagram, but not a written service level agreement. Further, as currently architected, the provider Health IT system is in the critical path of the response time and creating an SLA for multi-party transactions is difficult. Pended Status checking can be done either by Polling or Subscription, neither of which have a linked IG.
      • Process enablers such as ability to update or cancel the prior authorization have not been fully addressed.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            jason.teeple Jason Teeple
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: