Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-36356

Adjust note to implementers

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US Da Vinci DTR (FHIR)
    • 1.0.0 [deprecated]
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • Documentation Templates and Rules Implementation Guide Home Page
    • Hide

      The paragraph beginning "Both DTR and CRD are being balloted ..." will be completely removed. 

      Show
      The paragraph beginning "Both DTR and CRD are being balloted ..." will be completely removed. 
    • Bob Dieterle / Jeff Brown : 12-0-2
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      The note to implementers that starts "Both DTR and CRD are being balloted" needs to be revamped.

      1. It should use the standard "STU Note" formatting (see home page of CRD)
      2. It shouldn't be talking about CRD at all.  CRD talks about its state, DTR should talk about its own.  (It's also weird to talk about CRD and not PAS.)
      3. The wording of the last two sentences is sort of weird.  Not clear why we're trying to justify the STU process or the relationship between CRD and DTR - particularly given that DTR doesn't actually depend on CRD.  Perhaps consider stealing some of the language from CRD?

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            lloyd Lloyd McKenzie
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: