Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
US Da Vinci CRD (FHIR)
-
1.1.0-ballot [deprecated]
-
Financial Mgmt
-
Supported Hooks
-
4.3.2.3.2
-
-
Bob Dieterle / Jeff Brown : 8-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
-
Yes
Description
With no standardization of configuration options, do we have reason to think this will be useful in practice? Can we provide at least one (but preferably more than one) example of how this is expected to be used? The notes admit "This specification provides no guidance on exactly when/how CRD Clients are expected to manage hook configuration." but that feels like a weak excuse. The note "This could be done at the level of provider roles, individual providers, location from which the hook is invoked or other means. CRD Clients can experiment and determine what types of configuration make the most sense and at what levels they can support managing/persisting configuration information." further implies that clients would have prior knowledge of (and hard-coded behavior for) the options for each service, rather than dynamically interpreting the discovery response. It would be helpful to see how the client and server are expected to behave for an example option, with a clear indicator of what advantage the parties are expected to obtain from such a hard-coded behavior.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-32403 Negative - Christopher Schaut : 2022-May-FHIR IG COVREQDISC R2 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-33538 Negative - Daniel Rutz : 2022-May-FHIR IG COVREQDISC R2 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-33560 Negative - Thanos Tsiolis : 2022-May-FHIR IG COVREQDISC R2 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-33582 Negative - Chris Courville : 2022-May-FHIR IG COVREQDISC R2 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-33626 Negative - Daniel Zhang : 2022-May-FHIR IG COVREQDISC R2 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-33670 Negative - David Sundaram-Stukel : 2022-May-FHIR IG COVREQDISC R2 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-33692 Negative - Isaac Vetter : 2022-May-FHIR IG COVREQDISC R2 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-33714 Negative - Amit Popat : 2022-May-FHIR IG COVREQDISC R2 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-33736 Negative - Cooper Thompson : 2022-May-FHIR IG COVREQDISC R2 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-33758 Negative - Danielle Friend : 2022-May-FHIR IG COVREQDISC R2 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-33604 Negative - Peter DeVault : 2022-May-FHIR IG COVREQDISC R2 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-33648 Negative - Michael Clifton : 2022-May-FHIR IG COVREQDISC R2 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-33780 Negative - Vassil Peytchev : 2022-May-FHIR IG COVREQDISC R2 STU
- Balloted