Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-35663

Security normative requirements should be moved to Spedificaiton page

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Technical Correction Technical Correction
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • US Hybrid/Intermediary Exchange (FHIR)
    • 0.1.0
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • Exchange Routing CapabilityStatement - Destination Server
    • Specification
    • 4
    • Hide

      Add a statement to the top of the Security page stating that it contains conformance requirements, specifically...

      Note: This section contains mandatory conformance requirements, noted with "SHALL", "SHOULD" and "MAY".

      Show
      Add a statement to the top of the Security page stating that it contains conformance requirements, specifically... Note: This section contains mandatory conformance requirements, noted with "SHALL", "SHOULD" and "MAY".
    • Correction
    • Non-substantive
    • 0.1.0

    Description

      This is not part of the Specification page, yet uses normative language.  If normative, consider moving into Specification page, or labeling this as explicitly normative.  If not normative, remove normative language and make explicit that this is informative best practice guidance only.

      (Comment 19 - imported by: Chris Shawn)

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            jasonmccsmith Jason M. Smith (Inactive)
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: