Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-34951

Stronger language as to why Provider SHOULD also receive AEOB

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • US Da Vinci Patient Cost Transparency (PCT) (FHIR)
    • current
    • Financial Mgmt
    • STU
    • Patient Cost Transparency Implementation Guide Home Page
    • Hide

      Revisited 8/5 as part of a larger discussion on the fully revised Overview section. These edits were approved so this can be again noted ready for vote:

      To ensure the IG supports all potential flows of information, the IG supports an AEOB being sent from the payer to the provider, in addition to a FHIR-based approach for the required flow from the payer to the patient. In this way, the IG can support providers and payers as they work to develop and implement a flow of information that allows them to meet the legislative and future regulatory requirement as well as enable information sharing valuable to supporting patient care.

      Show
      Revisited 8/5 as part of a larger discussion on the fully revised Overview section. These edits were approved so this can be again noted ready for vote: To ensure the IG supports all potential flows of information, the IG supports an AEOB being sent from the payer to the provider, in addition to a FHIR-based approach for the required flow from the payer to the patient. In this way, the IG can support providers and payers as they work to develop and implement a flow of information that allows them to meet the legislative and future regulatory requirement as well as enable information sharing valuable to supporting patient care.
    • Corey Spears / Vanessa Candelora : 20-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      Current Language: Currently, there is no specific mandate dictating the Da Vinci Price Transparency IG work. Instead, this IG is informed by the No Surprises Act, which was enacted as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021. The No Surprises Act specifically requires that providers share GFE(s) with a payer and that a payer make an AEOB available to a patient in advance of service. The initial scope of this IG was inspired by this general requirement. While rulemaking has not yet addressed how specifically this general requirement will need to be implemented, this IG is being developed to support the flow of the necessary information from providers to the payer, to a patient. Subsequent iterations of this IG or other IGs will take into consideration any relevant future regulation or legislation, as appropriate or upon request. We welcome feedback on this topic.

      Comment: Suggest adding a statement here about the (optional) provision of the AEOB to the provider. This is critically important in facilitating informed conversations between providers/patients about costs; without the AEOB, the provider will have nothing to reference. We fully support the guide's inclusion of information about sending the AEOB to the provider, but it should be explained in the background section that while the law just requires the AEOB to be sent to the patient, this guide references sending it also to the provider, and this is strongly recommended for the reasons stated above.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            celine_lefebvre Celine Lefebvre
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: